Ready for which change?
An organisation may be enthusiastic about a new service and uncertain about the systems needed to deliver it. A team may understand the case for change while having little capacity to take on more work. “Are we ready?” needs a more specific conversation.
Start with the proposed change. What will people need to do differently? What remains undecided? Who will be affected, and what do they need to understand or contribute before a decision is made?
How is readiness different from resistance?
Armenakis, Harris and Mossholder’s 1993 paper describes readiness in terms of organisational members’ beliefs, attitudes and intentions, distinguishing it from resistance. That distinction helps avoid treating every question as an objection.
Someone asking about training may be trying to understand how to participate. Someone questioning a deadline may see a dependency that others have missed. Listen to the substance of the concern before deciding what it means about the person.
What evidence would be useful?
Ask people to explain the purpose of the change in their own words. Explore whether they believe the proposal addresses the situation, whether the necessary support exists and what it means for their own work.
Use more than one source. Conversations can reveal uncertainty; a capacity review can reveal competing commitments; a small trial can reveal operational constraints. Different groups may need different kinds of support, even when they share the same overall intention.
Where might work preferences help?
Some people want to explore alternatives; others want clarity about the chosen procedure. Some will want to think through the implications before discussing them. These are useful questions when planning participation and communication.
A cultureMAP can help a group consider its patterns of preference. It should inform questions about the proposed change, alongside direct evidence of understanding, capability and resources. A preference pattern cannot certify that an organisation is ready, or tell us that somebody will support a proposal.
What can leaders do next?
Identify the uncertainties that matter most and agree who will work on them. That might involve clarifying a decision, inviting people to test a process or providing time to learn. Describe the evidence that would give you confidence to proceed.
Review readiness as circumstances develop. A useful assessment leads to practical preparation and continued dialogue. It gives people an opportunity to influence how the change is carried out, rather than simply asking them to declare their support.
Sources and further reading
What would you like to explore?
If this relates to work in your organisation, we can begin with a conversation about your situation and what you want to achieve.
Talk with David ↗